Research

Strategies for cataract and uncorrected refractive error case finding in India: Costs and cost-effectiveness at scale

The text discusses a study focused on assessing the costs and cost-effectiveness of various strategies to identify and encourage people in India to seek corrective eye services. India has a high prevalence of visual impairment and blindness, and demand-based factors prevent many people from seeking appropriate eye care. The study analyzed five case-finding interventions, including primary eye health facilities (vision centers), school screenings, door-to-door eye screenings, eye camps, and teleophthalmology within vision centers. The findings indicated that eye camps and vision centers were the most cost-effective strategies for identifying and encouraging individuals to seek corrective eye services, particularly for cataracts and uncorrected refractive errors. In contrast, door-to-door and school screenings were less cost-effective, mainly due to higher costs associated with identifying uncorrected refractive errors. The study also estimated the annualized cost of operating a vision center and suggested that India should budget a substantial amount annually to establish and operate a network of vision centers across the country to provide adequate primary eye health services. The results highlighted the importance of cost-effective case-finding strategies in reducing the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in India.

Publication date

October 10, 2022

Publication

The Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia

Sponsor Institution

Seva Foundation

Authors

Brad Wong, Kuldeep Singh, Rohit C. Khanna, Thulasiraj Ravilla, Subeesh Kuyyadiyil, Shalinder Sabherwal, Asim Sil, Kuldeep Dole, Heidi Chase, Kevin D. Frick
Share this